• Home
  • What Could we do Better?
  • Instituting a Management Improvement Culture in Your Organization
  • Find the Root Cause Instead of the Person to Blame
  • Good Process Improvement Practices
  • Management is Prediction
  • The Purpose of an Organization
  • Performance Without Appraisal
  • Manufacturing and the Economy
  • Practical Ways to Respect People
  • 10 stocks for 10 years
  • Deming and Toyota
  • Curious Cat Management Improvement Articles
  • John Hunter
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement
  • Superfactory
  • Management Improvement Jobs
  • Deming on Management
  • Management and Leadership Quotes

    I am now using this blog to re-post some comments I make other blogs. For my full management blog see the Curious Cat Management Blog

    Sunday, January 08, 2006

    Agility vs. Six Sigma

    Topic: Management Improvement

    My response to the agilemanagement listL

    I agree with David, in this thread, as well as pretty much everything else actually. If I understand his writing correctly I am probably a bit more critical of how Six Sigma is actual practiced, but that is fairly minor difference of opinion.

    I have posted a couple item on managing innovation

    You manage processes, such as thinking up a new way to use computer technology, differently than you a process to manufacture tires. But the idea that you don't manage and improve the process just because the process seems discontinuous is a mistake.

    I think David is right to point to Clayton Christen's work - people talking about managing innovation should read it. Others to read: Edward deBono (he especially has very defined processes to encourage innovative thinking) and Gary Hamel articles.

    Previous post on Innovation in Organizations. Google also has good examples, on this topic:

    Douglas Merrill, senior director, information technology at Google "Innovation doesn't happen 'on the way by,' it must be design into everything we do,"

    Some people dislike the idea of managing processes. In my experience they then invent the idea that slow, boring process improvement is an alternative to innovation. That is just wrong. Process improvement should be part of a well run system, as should innovation. Deming, who many believe focused only process improvement, knew the importance of both. See several of Deming's ideas on innovation.

    Because Deming talked about the importance of using data to improve processes some believe he only focused on "incremental improvement." Deming continually stressed the need to innovate. And stressed that those who did not innovate but aimed for "zero defects" or continual improvement of an outdated product or service were doomed to fail.

    I have long been an advocate of Deming's ideas (which are the basis for much of lean thinking and a fair amount of Six Sigma also). So I do get annoyed when people try to paint the issue as process improvement v. innovation.

    John Hunter

    Related posts:


    Post a Comment

    << Home